JeffreyW wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 6:17 pm
Mark Tetzner wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 5:32 pm
1. Why is he unhappy?
2. You are implying that serious funds went into his company.
And maybe even insinuating that he does not believe as he speaks.
I think if you think and announce it so so: proove it.
Gruss, Mark
P.S. what does "monetized to the maximum" mean?
Is this going the route of him enriching himself on those
who need religion as "opium for the masses" (karl marx). ?
My honest intuition: this is probably bull.
He makes some money on books and if once in a while someone
pays him for an interview, then so be it.
Bernardo knows almost nothing about the possibilities he could have,
he thinks what he does is the result of carefully crafting things over the
years.
He made some money elsewhere in his life - that he is making any
money that can be considered "serious" on his books etc. is something I have
good reasons to doubt.
It sounds to me to be a bit on the conspiracy-side of things, but
let use know if you know better.
After all BK is not reading anything we say, so might as well
Unhappy as in angry that somebody would have the audacity to critique him as I did. Our mutual friend tends toward thinking the videos were unfair hatchet jobs, but again he has no background in these subjects.
He himself talks about the all the funding behind Essentia Foundation and he is following the same business model as other marketers selling themselves as the solution to your problems, such as Chopra, Peterson and Osteen. As they demonstrate, there is tremendous money in books and seminars - not so much in legitimate philosophy. Nietzsche lost money oh his self-published books and Wittgenstein needed about a decade to find a publisher for the Tractatus and never really made much money. He supported himself by teaching grammar school and his family inheritance, Heidegger was the rare exception, with Sein und Zeit as the biggest selling philosophy book of the 20th Century.
I hate to speculate about whether he believes what he’s saying or not. Probably does but isn’t all that confident he can defend it against someone with real knowledge of physics and philosophy. If he has time to respond to others on Twitter, he has time to respond to me also.
Ok, this business-model stuff is in my view just wrong, it is questionable at least in my mind, that that are his motives.
To me these are all Unterstellungen and I dont see how this essentiafoundation is taking of in any serious way (yet) and
if there is serious funding available I am missing the cues that tell me this is so. But I can not know and could be wrong.
It is also not impossible to find a sponsor or metaphysical "sugar-daddy/ who funds him so he can do his work and have a good life,
but I have no reason to believe that because his output would have to be much higher. There is hardly anything going on on his
blog anymore.
Maybe he has just become weary from too many LONG interviews and is taking a step back.....all within his rights.
The question would be of course what the funding, if it exists, would be for. It can only be either for research, but
not sure why it would get funds for research, other than maybe Daniel Hoffmann etc.
Or, more likely, to spread the word around as a project fueled by pure passion, but I dont see any marketing-activity, which in turn doesnt necessarily mean anything but its speculative. But the youtube-channel should normally grow or anything that makes me think funds flow into this and that marketing-bucks are being spent. The only goal right? More eye-balls.
When I click on any amazon-book by him I dont even get retargeted, to me this is not what is happening.
It doesnt have to take of in any of these ways, it gives meaning to peoples lives. To the lives of the founders
first of all, maybe to the life of the consumers if the foundation ever makes serious progress.
But I am sure that he is doing all this for genuine motives and not business-motives. If anything, the funding
is to drive the cause and I think you have turned him into a Feindbild,. To me: too many Unterstellungen.
That you can not see his passion and think this is a business-model: Its funny you think that its almost
definitely wrong.
He is evading you alright and that he is doing it for the resasons you like to think is nothing that can be ruled out.
Maybe he is not responding because its hard do do so on 5 bottles of wine which he now has to drink
because you have shattered his world-view.
But there have been others here who said things like "if you want to play with the big boys you have to talk to me"
but that person was more of an idiot. You are not an idiot and I said from the getgo I would like to see how he deals with your obections. But he could have a ton of reasons for not responding, he maybe does not want to be drawn into something
that could take weeks of his time. If he responds you will be challenging him again and that he wont be interested
to dedicate his entire life to you is something you can probably understand though.... I am sure you would like it the
other way around. Human nature.
There is also ill-will in the way you approach this and interpret him when it comes to him and his motives, that could be another reason.
To me, Even a blind man can see there is no business-model behind this.
Selling a solution to a problem? This is true for any book-sale, people like to read what interests them.
Nothing more to it.
There is also a good chance it doesnt even phase him.
In the end, who knows, its all speculative.
If he thinks he can eliminate your objections maybe one day we will hear from him.
Whether you have raised doubts in him is just another speculation.
His replique would have been interesting but maybe he is just coddeling his cat all day.
Which is a pitty but....
Time will tell. It´s his call alone.