Philosophical Speculations

It doesn't make you look any less biased, Federica, when you knowingly snip phrases from posts in order to misportray them. As you know, that phrase was qualified by the condition that "what Steiner is doing" is what you imagine it to be . But, he isn't. It is indisputable that Steiner consistently ...

Yes, it is evident that your intention has been to emulate Cleric - probably too tightly, and now you are drifting into a skewed turn. If you emulated the approach a bit more loosely and single-handedly, letting go of the well-known metaphors and pictures, you would certainly be able to avoid ...

For the records , I am reminded of the fact that in 2023, in response to questions by Anthony and Eugene, Cleric wrote a few posts to begin to elaborate on "the nature of light" from a spiritual perspective - from this post . As he wrote elsewhere, "If we want a truer sense of the physical world ...

I see there is no easy way to convey 'what is missing' here. I suppose we can again try to establish that some of Moore's key indications are simply false , just as some of Cowan's were. For example: https://share.google/aimode/2qmvr6L88xFQtPRbN "The Circulatory System isn't a Straw: The claim ...

For the records, here's a professor at Columbia (followed by Levin) now restacking that "the heart is not a pump" post with the reference to Moore's book. This is so cool, he says. "Full implications far from understood!" It seems like for him something is missing. And he doesn't seem to be much ...

AshvinP wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2026 2:14 pm ...

Thanks, this is very clear writing, helpful.

Other than that, Ashvin, it feels unproductive that you continually want to "recenter" what I write along your preferred directions that avoid the main question. I am not going to simply follow your arbitrary orders instead. I accept that you are not interested in this discussion, but you won't ...

You misunderstood my reference to KHW. Obviously, that work cannot be placed on the same level as any of the APs or GPs we were discussing (notice the comparison was between Catching the Light and the work of MS/Ashton). Ok good to know, but you will admit that, when you speak in plural - when you ...

You misunderstood my reference to KHW. Obviously, that work cannot be placed on the same level as any of the APs or GPs we were discussing (notice the comparison was between Catching the Light and the work of MS/Ashton). Ok good to know, but you will admit that, when you speak in plural - when you ...

... Ok, Ashvin, thanks for your reply. I think this closes the discussion, as you have now made precisely clear how you relate to the mentioned spiritual scientific works, including Steiner's Knowledge of the higher worlds. I will admit I am surprised, in a sense, by this clarification. And in ...